Note
The Clawback: Reclaiming Strategic Assets from China
The United States is on an unspoken mission to claw back strategic assets from China.
Director
Reva Goujon is a Director at Rhodium Group, leading client engagement for Rhodium China’s corporate advisory team.
ChinaReva has almost two decades of professional experience as a geopolitical strategist, working with business and government clients to manage risks, assess scenarios, and make informed decisions. Reva is known for her ability to watch the map move and anticipate how deep, structural forces, including US-China competition, disruptive technologies, or the reorganization of global trade, are forcing a rethink of corporate strategy and behavior. Reva also contributes to research on US-China relations, industrial policies and China’s economic statecraft.
Prior to joining Rhodium Group, Reva was Managing Director and Head of Strategic Intelligence at Martin+Crumpton Group, a strategic advisory and risk management consulting firm. Before that, she was Vice President of Global Analysis at Stratfor, where she led a global team of analysts and served as chief thought leader for the firm’s strategic analysis, forecasting, and scenario-planning services.
Reva is a term member of the Council on Foreign Relations. She has a Bachelor’s degree in government from the University of Texas at Austin and a Master’s degree from the Security Studies program of the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University in Washington, DC.
Note
The United States is on an unspoken mission to claw back strategic assets from China.
Note
We break down the potential fault lines within the five core assumptions implicit in emerging US AI policy. This lets us stress test the US approach and anticipate what the next wave of AI competition will likely entail.
Journal article
As the tenor of the global AI race grows existential, the high-stakes wagers of tech titans and world powers risk geopolitical combustion.
Journal article
America now has the upper hand—but Trump’s maximalist tariffs would still carry risks.